Uso de ChatGpt en educación superior. Un análisis en función del género, rendimiento académico, año y grado universitario del alumnado

En los últimos años, el uso de sistemas basados en Inteligencia Artificial, como ChatGPT, ha ido ganando popularidad entre los estudiantes de educación superior, en parte porque les permite optimizar el tiempo requerido para el trabajo académico. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido determinar la frecuencia de uso de ChatGPT por parte de estudiantes universitarios con fines académicos y si existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el uso según el género, la edad, el rendimiento académico, el año académico y el grado de los participantes. Entre una muestra de 507 estudiantes universitarios, los resultados mostraron un uso moderadamente bajo de ChatGPT con fines académicos, aunque se encontraron diferencias significativas basadas en variables personales. Específicamente, se encontró un uso estadísticamente mayor de ChatGPT con fines académicos en hombres (en comparación con mujeres), en estudiantes de cursos intermedios (en comparación con estudiantes que acaban de comenzar o están terminando sus estudios) y en estudiantes inscritos en el programa de grado de Educación Primaria (en comparación con otros grados asociados con el campo educativo). No se encontraron diferencias significativas basadas en la edad. Estos hallazgos destacan la necesidad de establecer el perfil de las personas que más utilizan los sistemas basados en IA para detectar y prevenir posibles comportamientos deshonestos, como el plagio o el fraude en tareas, y así promover un uso responsable de dichas herramientas entre los estudiantes de educación superior.

Ver más Ver menos

Citas:

Ahmad, S.F., Rahmat, M.K., Mubarik, M.S., Alam, M.M. y Hyder, S.I. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902

Blasko, D.G., Lum, H.C. y Campbell, J. (2020). Gender Differences in Perceptions of Technology, Technology Readiness, and Spatial Cognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 64(1), 1395-1399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641333

Botelho, F.H.F. (2021). Accessibility to digital technology: Virtual barriers, real opportunities. Assistive Technology, 33(sup1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1945705

Bryant, J. (2022). Digital technologies and inclusion in humanitarian response. HPG report. ODI 5.

Chen, L., Chen, P. y Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Acess, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chen, N.S., Yin, C., Isaias, P. y Psotka, J. (2020). Educational big data: Extracting meaning from data for smart education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635395

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dutsinma, L.I., Rohan, R., Ninrutsirikun, U. y Pal, D. (2023). University Students’ Acceptance and Usage of Generative AI (ChatGPT) from a Psycho-Technical Perspective. In N. Waraporn (Chairperson), 13th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (pp. 1-8). Association for Computing Machinery.

Eccles, J.S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116-132.

Firaina, R. y Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the Usage of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Frequency and Impact on Productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v2i01.310

Gorjón, L. y Osés, A. (2023). The Negative Impact of Information and Communication Technologies Overuse on Student Performance: Evidence From OECD Countries. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(4), 723-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221133408

Grace, E.G., Vidhyavathi, P. y Malathi, P. (2023). A study on “AI in education: opportunities and challenges for personalized learning. Industrial Engineering Journal, 52(05),750-759. https://doi.org/10.36893/IEJ.2023.V52I05.750-759

Haque, M., Dharmadasa, I., Tasnim, Z., Namal, R. y Ahmad, H. (2022). “I think this is the most disruptive technology”: Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data. Arxiv, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856

Highet, C., Skelly, H. y Alexandra T. (2017). Gender and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Survey Toolkit. USAID.

Ivankina, L.I., Trubchenko, T.G., Krukovac, E.M., Shaidullina, A.R., Shaftelskaya, N.V. y Chernyak, V.K. (2017). The Use of Information and Communication Technologies by Elderly People (Sociological Survey Data). En Z. Bekirogullari (Ed.), EpSBS - European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 235-242). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.32

Jara, I. y Ochoa, J.M. (2020). Usos y efectos de la inteligencia artificial en educación. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0002380

Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S. y Kaynak, O. (2022). Quo vadis artifcial intelligence?. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2,4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8

Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K. y Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of Ascilite (pp. 484-492). Ascilite.

Kok, J.N., Boers, E.J., Kosters, W.A., Van der Putten, P. y Poel, M. (2002). Artificial intelligence: definition, trends, techniques, and cases. In UNESCO (Ed.), Knowledge for sustainable development: an insight into the Encyclopedia of life support systems (pp. 1095-1107). EOLS.

Korteling, J.E., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G.C., Blankendaal, R.A.M., Boonekamp, R.C. y Eikelboom, A.R. (2021). Human-versus Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.622364

Kotzé, T.G., Anderson, O. y Summerfield, K. (2016). Technophobia: Gender differences in the adoption of high-technology consumer products. South African Journal of Business Management, 47(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v47i1.49

Lai, K.W. y Hong, K-S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12161

Lei, J. y Zhao, J. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013

Lozano, M.A. y Pérez, R.D. (2021). Use of Basic Technological Devices and Student’s Academic Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 4(8), 1102-1105. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i8-07

Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J.A., Sherwani, F. y Usman, M. (2022). AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938

Neumann, M., Rauschenberger, M. y Schön, E.M. (2023). “We Need To Talk About ChatGPT”: The Future of AI and Higher Education. En C. Péraire y S. Krusche (Eds.), IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for the Next Generation (pp. 29-32). IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010

Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2023). Gender differences in perception of artificial intelligence-based tools. Journal of Digital Art y Humanities, 4(2), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8149.4.2_6

Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Abayomi-Alli, O., Hardaker, G., Scherer, R., Sarker, Y., Kumar, S. y Zubairu, J. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4225-4258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x

Rashid, T. y Muhammad, H. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084

Reiss, M.J. (2021). The use of AI in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education, 19. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.05

Romero-Rodríguez, J.M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., Buenestado-Fernández, M. y Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Sabbagh, C. (2021). Self-reported academic performance and academic cheating: Exploring the role of the perceived classroom (in)justice mediators. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1517-1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12433

Sobieraj, S. y Krämer, N.C. (2020). Similarities and differences between genders in the usage of computer with different levels of technological complexity. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.021

Stevens, J.P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge.

Stone, P., Brooks, R. y Brynjolfsson, R. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030. One hundred year study on artificial intelligence: report of the 2015–2016 study panel. Stanford University.

Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881

Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?. ArXiv, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292

Thuy, T. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Tiwari, C.K., Abass, M., Tariq, S., Subramaniam, R. y Irshad, M.A. (2023). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061

Torres-Díaz, J.C., Duart, J.M., Gómez-Alvarado, H.F., Marín-Gutiérrez, I. y Saegarra-Faggioni, V. (2016). Internet Use and Academic Success in University Students. Comunicar, 24(48), 61-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-06

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. y Davis, F.D. (2023). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S.D., Tegmark, M. y Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Voelkl, K. y Frone, M.R. (2004). Academic Performance and Cheating: Moderating Role of School Identification and Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121

Wang, Z., Liu, J. y Dong, R. (2018). Intelligent Auto-grading System. 2018 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2018.8691244

Yap, Y.Y., Yan, S.H. y Choon, S.W. (2022). Elderly’s intention to use technologies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(1), e08765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08765

Zhang, M. (2023). Older people’s attitudes towards emerging technologies: A systematic literature review. Public Understanding of Science, 32(8), 948-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231171677

Ver más Ver menos