Architectural research facing the challenges of the 21st century: Criticality, creativity and diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2024.20608Keywords:
architectural research, criticality, creativity, diversityAbstract
As we enter the 21st century, a new era of digital technologies is offering increasing possibilities, but at the same time, posing serious challenges to architectural research. Therefore, the recovery of a critical approach is more necessary than ever. This should encompass not only the critical evaluation of the aforementioned technologies, but also counteract models of thought associated with them, such as the standardization of languages or the hegemony of solutionism. Likewise, it is also necessary to reclaim imagination and brilliance as attributes of a seriously threatened freedom. Working on the challenges of our time must emphasize the ideation, development and definition of mental processes and structures, mechanisms that are still outside the scope of technologies such as Artificial Intelligence. Finally, it is still important to reassert that all architectural postulates should be understood in the cultural environment and physical surroundings in which they are produced, admitting their diversity and avoiding a Eurocentric view. Current environmental degradation can be understood as a symptom of a crisis of civilization, marked by a model of living that does not recognize the need to understand ourselves and our built environment in relation to nature.
Downloads
References
Benjamin, Walter. “L’œuvre d’art à l’époque de sa reproduction mécanisée.” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 5. 1 (1936): 40-68. https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs193651130
Berardi, Franco. The uprise. Poetry and finance. Los Angeles: Semiotexte, 2012.
De Santillana, Giorgio, and Hertha Von Dechend. El molino de Hamlet: los orígenes del conocimiento humano y su transmisión a través del mito. Madrid: Sexto Piso, 2015.
Coderch, José Antonio. “No son genios lo que necesitamos ahora.” Revista Arquitectura, no. 38 (1961): 21-23.
Eco, Umberto. Apocalípticos e integrados. Barcelona: Lumen, 1968.
Garcés, Marina. Nueva ilustración radical. Barcelona: Nuevos cuadernos anagrama, 2017.
González de Canales, Francisco. “Los hechos post-modernos de la arquitectura digital.” Ra. Revista De Arquitectura, no.12 (2016): 37-42. https://doi.org/10.15581/014.12.4450
McCoy, Esther. Vienna to Los Angeles: Two Journeys: Letters Between R. M. Schindler and Richard Neutra: Letters of Louis Sullivan to R.M. Schindler. Santa Monica, CA: Arts & Architecture, 1979.
Morozov, Evgeny. La locura del solucionismo tecnológico. Madrid: Katz, 2015.
Schumacher, Patrik. The Autopoiesis of Architecture. Londres: Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Spencer, Douglas. “Return the gift,” Fulcrum, no. 87 (2014): 2.
Han, Byung-Chul. La Sociedad de la transparencia. Barcelona: Herder, 2011.
Tafuri, Manfredo. Arquitectura, crisis, critica radical. Para un critica de la ideología arquitectónica. Sevilla: Ediciones Vibok, 2020.
Tanizaki, Jun’ichirō. In Praise of Shadows. Londres: Vintage, 2001.
Real Academia Española. Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed. Madrid: Espasa, 2014.
Richard and Dion Neutra Papers (Collection 1179). UCLA Library Special Collections, Charles E. Young Research Library, UCLA, box 1959, folder 4. Japanese Garden Preface February 1959.
Schindler, Rudolf Michael. “A Cooperation Dwelling.” T-Square, Band 2 (1932): 20–21.
White, William H. The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1956.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 VLC arquitectura. Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Accepted 2024-03-04
Published 2024-04-30