Battles and Love's Labour's Lost. Jorge Juan 55 as a critical commodity
Submitted: 2024-05-15
|Accepted: 2024-11-13
|Published: 2025-04-30
Copyright (c) 2025 VLC arquitectura. Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Jorge Juan 55, artistic commodity, myth, architectural project, Francisco Alonso de Santos
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
This article analyses the dual nature of the disciplinary narrative around architectural design. While the necessary technical control to which architecture owes its status as a regulated profession in Spain demands a clear service component, the secular tradition of Spanish architecture has always been closer to the artistic interpretation of the project. It is in this context that the contemporary view of intellectual work, of artistic work and its transformation into a commodity and, in short of whether it can be isolated from the capitalist exchange market to become a critical, uncomfortable and contentious object can be introduced to the debate. The unique characteristics of the work of Francisco Alonso de Santos in the premises at no. 55 Calle Jorge Juan in Madrid, make it the principal case study for this research in which, through access to previously unpublished photographic and project documentation, we analyse the duality between architect and artist and the relationship, constantly at the core of the disciplinary debate, between architects, their clients and the works in which they encounter one another, whether as battlefields or as love’s labour’s lost.
References:
Alonso de Santos, Francisco. “Construir en español.” 26 de abril de 2024. Conferencia, del Colegio de Arquitectos de Gran Canaria, 3:14:53. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOQPXum237I
Alonso de Santos, Francisco, Maite Sebastiá, and Marina P. Asins. “Francisco Alonso nos habla de su obra más icónica, la zapatería de Jorge Juan 55, de Madrid: El reto era hacer de los actos humanos monumento.” AD Architectural Digest, 8 March , 2014. https://www.revistaad.es/articulos/paco-alonso-entrevista-exclusiva-zapateria-jorge-juan
Asensio-Wandosell, Carlos, and Moisés Puente. “Una visita inesperada.” MAET. Magacín arquitectura de la Escuela de Toledo, no. 5 (2017): 98-106.
Capitel, Antón. Arquitectura española, años 50 - años 80. Madrid: Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transportes, 1986.
Capitel, Antón. “Mis memorias de la Escuela de Arquitectura.” Veredes, Arquitectura y divulgación (blog), October 4, 2013. https://veredes.es/blog/mis-memorias-de-la-escuela-de-arquitectura-anton-capitel/
Franco Díaz, Arturo. “Invariantes del pensamiento en los arquitectos de Madrid. Primera década del siglo xxi. Una historia de transmisión oral.” PhD diss., Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20868/UPM.thesis.38329
Graw, Isabelle. “El valor de la mercancía artística. Doce tesis sobre el trabajo humano. el deseo mimético y la vitalidad.” ARQ, no. 97 (diciembre 2017): 130-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-69962017000300130
López-Peláez Morales, José Manuel. “La difusa presencia de Mies en la arquitectura madrileña.” Quaderns d’arquitectura i urbanisme, no. 172 (1987): 80-93. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/QuadernsArquitecturaUrbanisme/article/view/203581/307402
Quetglas, Josep. “Convocar piedras.” Arquitectos, no. 37 (1995): 47-50.
Sennett, Richard. El artesano. Translated by Marco Aurelio Galmarini. 6th ed. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama, 2017.
Zabalbeascoa, Anatxu. “Una extraña joya arquitectónica de Francisco Alonso en peligro.” El País, 28 August, 2023. https://elpais.com/cultura/2023-08-28/una-extrana-joya-arquitectonica-de-francisco-alonso-en-peligro.html
Zucchi, Dino, ed. Bau-Kunst-Bau. Milano: Clean Edizioni, 1994.




