Analysis of institutional factors in the implementation of the action research methodology: lessons learned in a case study
Submitted: 2024-06-21
|Accepted: 2024-09-13
|Published: 2024-11-13
Copyright (c) 2023 María Eugenia Clouet, José A. Alfaro-Tanco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
case report, action research, institutional factors, practice, diagnose
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
The growing need for academic research to generate a tangible social impact has increased the relevance of collaborative methodologies. Among them, the "Action Research" method stands out for its application in the field of business organization. This is especially relevant in the field of Operations Management as it involves close collaboration with organizations.
This study aims to examine the key institutional factors that influence the success of the implementation of the "Action Research" methodology in the business context. Through a case study, two main contributions are made to the "Action Research" literature. First, six key institutional factors are identified to consider in the implementation of an Action Research project: external and internal environment, leadership, strategy, communication, and organizational resources and capabilities. Second, the analysis provides a series of lessons learned that cover the influence of aspects related to company's environment; alignment of objectives; participation of employees; clear definition of roles; training; adaptation and support of work team member; an adequate technological infrastructure; how to promote the participation of external agents; and the influence of communication channels.
The identification and analysis of these factors and the lessons learned serve as a reference framework for researchers who are considering carrying out an "Action Research" project to transfer it to the company with which they are going to collaborate, and thus determine if the right conditions are in place to carry out the study.
References:
Alexander, I. (2001). Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000387
Alfaro-Tanco, J. A.; Avella, L.; Moscoso, P.; Naslund, D. (2021). An evaluation framework for the dual contribution of action research: Opportunities and challenges in the field of operations management. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 20, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211017636
Avella Camarero, L.; Alfaro, J. A. (2014). Spanish University Business Chairs used to increase the deployment of Action Research in Operations Management: A case study and analysis. Action Research, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 193 - 207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750314528010
Avison, D.; Lau, F.; Myers, M.; Nielsen, P. (1999). Action research. Commun. ACM, 42, 94-97. https://doi.org/10.1145/291469.291479
Bargal, D. (2008). Action research: A paradigm for achieving social change. Small Group Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407313407
Baskerville, R. L.; Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 235-246.
Braz, R. G. F.; Scavarda, L. F.; Martins, R. A. (2011). Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 133, pp. 751–760.
Carr, W (2006). Philosophy, Methodology and Action Research, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 421-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00517.x
Coghlan, D. (2007). Insider action research doctorates: Generating actionable knowledge. Higher Education. Vol. 54, pp. 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5450-0
Coghlan, D. (2010). Seeking common ground in the diversity and diffusion of action research and collaborative management research action modalities: Toward a general empirical method. In A. B. (Rami) Shani, R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Edss). Research in Organizational Change and Development (Vol. 18, pp. 149-181). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Coughlan P.; Coghlan D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515
Coughlan, P.; Draaijer, D.; Godsell, J.; Boer, H. (2016). Operations and supply chain management: The role of academics and practitioners in the development of research and practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1673-1695. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2015-0721
Dey, P. K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Ho, W. (2015). Strategic supplier performance evaluation: A case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organization. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 166, pp. 192–214.
Eriksson, P.; Kovalainen, A. (2011). Qualitative Methods in Business Research, Sage Publications: London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028044
Erro-Garcés, A.; Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2020). Action research as a meta-methodology in the management field. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 19, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920917489
Evered, R.; Louis, M. R. (1981). Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “Inquiry from the outside.” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 385-395. https://doi.org/10.2307/257374
Githens, R. P. (2015). Critical action research in human resource development. Human Resources Development Review, Vol.14, No. 2, pp. 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315581934
Greenwood, D. J.; Levin, M. (1998). Action Research, Science, and Co-Optation of Social Research. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, Vol. 4, pp. 237-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10245289808523514
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kaplan, R. S. (1998). Innovation Action Research: Creating New Management Theory and Practice. Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 89-118.
Karlsson, C. (2009). Research methods for operations management. Taylor and Francis.
Kates, S. M.; Robertson, J. (2004). Adapting action research to marketing. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 3/4, pp. 418-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410518620
Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. J., & Maheut, J. (2018). Protocol: action planning for action research about kaizen in public organizations. The case of higher education. Working Papers on Operations Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8990
Melin, U.; Axelsson, K. (2016). Action in Action Research – Elaborating the Concepts of Action, Roles and Dilemmas in a Public e-service Development Project. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 118-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-10-2015-0074
Mejía-Villa, A.; Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2017). Action Research Projects: one step ahead in the researcher-practitioner relationships. Working papers on operations management. Vol. 8, pp. 191 - 203. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7660
Neely, A.; Bourne, M.; Kennerley, M. (2000). Performance measurement system design: Developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20, pp. 1119–1145.
Nordström, M.; Axelsson, K. (2011), Systems, Signs & Actions. An International Journal on Communication, Information Technology and Work Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 133–146.
Ollila, S.; Yström, A. (2017). An investigation into the roles of open innovation collaboration managers. R & D Management, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 236-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12197
Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research: A key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 87-94.
Reason, P. (2006). Choice and Quality in Action Research Practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 187 - 203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606288074
Rodriguez-Ferradas, M. I.; Sanjurjo-San Martin, E. L.; Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2023). Relevant Factors Influencing Cognitive Distance in the Performance of Collaborative Research Projects. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231174761
Shani, A. B. (Rami); Coghlan (2021). Action research in business and management: A reflective review. Action Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 518-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319852147
Shaw, N. E.; Burgess, T. F.; Hwarng, H. B.; de Mattos, C. (2001). Revitalising new process development in the UK fine chemicals industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, pp. 1133–1151.
Susman, G. I.; Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, pp. 582–601.
Westbrook, R. (1995). Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510104466
Zuber-Skerritt O, & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710829983
