Implementation and Evaluation of a Curricular Framework for Online Language Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2023.16117Keywords:
online courses, curricular framework, online learning, oral proficiency, Speak Everywhere, Computer-assisted language learningAbstract
Constraints caused by the Covid-19 pandemic led to a spike in courses originally designed for in-class instruction being delivered online. As the pandemic wanes many courses will return to in-class instruction while other programs will look to develop post-pandemic long-term online courses, indicating a clear need for an effective curriculum for online foreign language classes. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of a newly developed curricular framework for online language courses at university level. Primarily, this framework is designed to foster oral proficiency. The technology used to implement the framework was also developed specifically to facilitate speaking practice. We have used the framework at Purdue University to develop a curriculum for Japanese online courses Levels 1–4 (i.e., semesters 1–4). Japanese Level 1 is used in this article to illustrate the features and effectiveness of the framework. The framework has three major components: asynchronous self-learning modules, weekly small-group synchronous sessions, and performance-based assessments. Each component involves a pedagogical innovation, a technological innovation, or both. This study’s main research question was, “Do students in an online course designed using the new framework develop a degree of oral proficiency comparable to that of students in a classroom?” An oral test administered at the end of the course showed that the online students performed comparably to their classroom counterparts on question and answer and picture description tasks and outperformed them on an elicited imitation task. The results of a questionnaire also indicated participants’ positive perceptions of the technology used and the online course itself. These findings serve as further evidence for the effectiveness of the proposed curricular framework.
Downloads
References
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd/Kindle ed). Georgetown University Press.
Blake, R. J. (2015). The messy task of evaluating proficiency in online language courses. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_5
Blake, R. J., & Shiri, S. (2012). Online Arabic language learning: What happens after? L2 Journal, 4(2), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.5070/L24212462
Blake, R. J., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114.
Cahill, D., & Catanzaro, D. (1997). Teaching first-year Spanish on-line. CALICO Journal, 14(2-4), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v14i2-4.97-113
Fukada, A. (2013). An online oral practice/assessment platform: Speak Everywhere. The IALLT Journal, 43(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v43i1.8518
Fukada, A., & Wei, M. (2013). Nihongo kyōiku genba ni okeru supīkingu shidō no ichizuke to genjō: Ankēto yobi chōsa ni motozuite [The current status of speaking training in Japanese language courses: A pilot survey]. In K. Matsumoto, S. Tomizawa, & G. Zheng (Eds.), Embracing the new phase in Japanese education in the United States (pp. 61-74). Ball State University.
Hampel, R. (2003). Theoretical perspectives and new practices in audio-graphic conferencing for language learning. ReCALL, 15(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344003000314
Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66-82.
Harlow, L. L., & Muyskens, J. A. (1994). Priorities for intermediate-level language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02025.x
Houston, T. (2005). Outcomes assessment for beginning and intermediate Spanish: One program's process and results. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02223.x
Lamy, M.-N. (2004). Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(2), 520-538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400400182X
Peterson, J. (2021). Speaking ability progress of language learners in online and face"to"face courses. Foreign Language Annals, 54(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12511
Rivera, G. M., & Matsuzawa, C. (2007). Multiple-language program assessment: Learner's perspectives on first-and second-year college foreign language programs and their implications for program improvement. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02881.x
Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2018). Learning trajectories and the role of online courses in a language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1360362
Tateyama, Y. (2015). Advanced Japanese online: Course effectiveness and student perceptions. Japanese Language and Literature, 333-368.
Terhune, N. M. (2016). Language learning going global: Linking teachers and learners via commercial Skype-based CMC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1071-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061020
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00053
Uchida, N. (2015). From traditional to performance-based assessment: Student perceptions and implications of a new achievement assessment in introductory Japanese courses [Master's thesis, Purdue University]. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_theses/1081
Wu, S.-L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 680-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12063
Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Ginther, A. (2016). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing, 33(4), 497-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215594643
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mayu Miyamoto, Jeff Peterson, Atsushi Fukada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License