Do gender-pairings and age/proficiency interplay in LRE production? A preliminary study with young CLIL learners
Submitted: 2024-09-13
|Accepted: 2025-04-30
|Published: 2025-07-25
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
young learners, language-related episodes, gender-pairings, proficiency, CLIL
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
Many studies have explored Language-Related Episodes (LREs) during collaborative dialogue. However, research on the factors affecting LRE production in children, especially regarding gender-pairings in CLIL contexts, remains limited (e.g., Martínez-Adrián & Gutiérrez-Mangado, 2022). Also, no studies have tackled the interplay between gender-pairings and age/proficiency in LRE production amongst young learners. To fill this gap, the study involved CLIL learners aged 9–11 who worked in same- and mixed-gender dyads to complete an oral picture-based narrative task. The LREs were analysed based on the amount, nature (meaning vs form) and resolution (target-like, non-target-like or unresolved). The preliminary results indicate that same-gender dyads seem to outperform mixed-gender pairs in both groups as they produce more LREs. Also, as age/proficiency increases, same-gender dyads tend to produce more target-like LREs. Thus, despite significant proficiency differences between both groups, the tendency towards working better in matched-gender pairs seems to persist throughout middle childhood.
References:
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher, & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243-266). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Alcón, E. (1994). “The role of participation and gender in non-native speakers’ classroom interaction”, Working Papers on Language, Gender, and Sexism, 4/1, 51-68.
Alcón, E., & Codina, V. (1996). “The impact of gender on negotiation and vocabulary learning in a situation of interaction”, International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 12, 21-35.
Azkarai, A. (2015). “Males and females in EFL task-based interaction: Does gender have an impact on LREs?”, Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 9-35.
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. del P. (2012). Does gender influence task performance in EFL? Interactive tasks and language related episodes. In E. Alcón Soler & M. P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Language learners’ discourse across L2 instructional settings (pp. 249-278). Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208598_013
Azkarai, A., & Imaz-Agirre, A. (2017). Gender and age in child interaction in an EFL CLIL context: An exploratory study. In M. del P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: research insights (pp. 103-123). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730589.10
Azpilicueta-Martínez, R. (2025). “Exposure or age? The effect of additional CLIL instruction on young learners’ grammatical complexity while performing an oral task”, Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241303250
Barañano-Arroyo, M. (2023). Gender effects and attention to form in tasks with a written component [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. University of the Basque Country.
Basterrechea, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2020). “Language-related episodes and pair dynamics in primary school CLIL learners: A comparison between proficiency matched and student-selected pairs”, Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10/3, 423-447. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.2
Basterrechea, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2023). “Collaborative writing and patterns of interaction in young learners: The interplay between pair dynamics and pairing method in LRE production”, Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 49-76. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i20.4354
Basterrechea, M. & García Mayo, M. P. (2013). Language-related episodes (LREs) during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 24-43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.34.05ch2
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). “Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL”, Language Awareness, 28/2, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229
Basterrechea, M., Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2017). “Gender effects on strategic competence: A survey study on compensatory strategies in a CLIL context”, ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 17, 47-70. https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.03
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2021). “Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication”, Language Awareness,30/1, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Donaldson, J. (2012). Room on the broom. Penguin Books.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). “A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world”, The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2024). “The role of proficiency and pair formation method in language-related episodes: A study of young CLIL learners’ interaction”, Language Teaching Research28/3, 1087-1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211024363
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Martínez-Adrián, M. (2022). “Task-modality effects on the production and elaboration of language-related episodes: A study on schoolchildren’s interactions in a foreign language”, Languages 7/4, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040306
García Mayo, M. del P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task-modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical potential (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.10gar
García Mayo, M. del P., & Hidalgo, M. de los Á. (2017). “L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction”, System, 67, 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004
García Mayo, M. del P., & Imaz-Agirre, A. (2016). “Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study”, The Language Learning Journal, 44/4, 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799
García Mayo, M. del P., & Imaz-Agirre, A. (2019). “Task-modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children”, System 80, 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language interaction (pp. 327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Gutiérrez-Mangado, M., & Basterrechea, M. (2025). “Investigating the effect of task modality on the written and oral production of young EFL learners”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0206
Hakes, D. T. (1980). A study of children’s metalinguistic abilities: Results and discussion. In D. T. Hakes (Ed.), The development of metalinguistic abilities in children (pp. 61-96). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67761-8_4
Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2014). Peer socialization of gender in young boys and girls. Encyclopaedia on Early Childhood Development. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development and Strategic Knowledge Cluster on Early Child Development, 1-4. https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/pdf/expert/gender-early-socialization/according-experts/peer-socialization-gender-young-boys-and-girls
Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). “The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning”, Language Teaching Research, 19/1, 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736
Hidalgo, M. de los Á. (2021). “Differences in the task-supported negotiations of younger and older EFL children: From repair into prevention”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59/3, 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0206
Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (2003). Different voices, different views: An introduction to current research in language and gender. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), Handbook of language and gender (pp. 1-17). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch
IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 28.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
Iglesias-Diéguez, K., Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2025). “Peer-to-peer interaction in task-based learning and the development of young EFL learners’ productive vocabulary: an exploratory study”, Language Awareness, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2025.2456754
Iwashita, N. (2001). “The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative–nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language”, System, 29/2, 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00015-X
Kasprowicz, R. E., & Marsden, E. (2018). “Towards ecological validity in research into input‐based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form–meaning practice”, Applied Linguistics, 39, 886-911. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw051
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). “The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners”, Language Teaching Research, 12/2, 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). “Foreign language competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses”, The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030
Leaper, C., & Ayres, M. M. (2007). “A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11/4, 328-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307302221
Leeser, M. J. (2004). “Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue”, Language Teaching Research, 8/1, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
Llinares, A. & Morton, T. (2017). Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2012). Interaction approach in second language acquisition. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2748-2758). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0551
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maltz, D., & Borker, R. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196-2016). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620836.013
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Arratibel-Irazusta, I. (2020). “The interface between task-modality and the use of previously known languages in young CLIL English learners”, Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10/3, 473-500. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.4
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Arratibel-Irazusta, I. (2024). “Pairing method and young learners’ use of previously known languages during task-based interaction”, TASK, 4/1, 78-110. https://doi.org/10.1075/task.22011.mar
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2021). “Task-modality and language related episodes in young learners: An attempt to manage accuracy and editing”, Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211052808
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J. (2022). “Gender-pairings in EFL child task-based interaction”, Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i19.3761
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Iglesias-Diéguez, K. (under review). “What role do metalinguistic explanations play on LRE production in a dictogloss task targeting the possessive determiners his/her?”
Martínez-Adrián, M. & Nieva-Marroquín, M. (2023). Exploring the pseudo-longitudinal development of specific morphosyntactic features and syntactic complexity in CLIL young learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61/3, 1197-1223. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0137
McCloskey, L. A., & Coleman, L. M. (1992). “Difference without dominance: Children’s talk in mixed- and same-sex dyads”, Sex Roles, 27, 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289927
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). “CLIL as a way to multilingualism”, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21/1, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386
Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). “Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing”, Language Teaching Research, 21/4, 496-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816641703
Muñoz, C. (2007). Age-related differences and second language learning practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 229-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.014
Muñoz, C. (2014). The development of language awareness at the transition from primary to secondary School. In M. del P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 49-68). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-005
Oliver, R. (2002). “The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions”, The Modern Language Journal, 86/1, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00138
Oliver, R. (2009). How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and feedback in children aged five to seven years. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 135-156). New York: Routledge.
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2017). “Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000058
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2019). “Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners: What is the impact of proficiency and task-type?”, Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1/1, 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. (2019). “Impact of task-modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study”, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22/5, 614-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1292999
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Peer interaction and second language learning (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551349
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). “Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: what factors foster a focus on form?”, Language Awareness, 19, 261-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.516831
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Pica, T. (2013). From input, output and comprehension to negotiation, evidence, and attention: An overview of theory and research on learner interaction and SLA. In M. del P. García Mayo, J. Gutierrez-Mangado & M. Martínez-Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 49-69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.9.06ch3
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). “Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11/1, 63-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000783X
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13/3, 343-376. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010020
Pinter, A. (2006). “Verbal evidence of task-related strategies: Child versus adult interactions”, System, 34/2, 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.005
Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2021). “Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction”, Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3/2, 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20007.pla
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). “How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research”, Language Learning, 64/4, 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions between second language learners: Exploring the role of gender. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.
Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 52-77). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sánchez Ruiz, R., & Lucas Pardo, S. (2016). “Improving English oral skills through pair work and peer-peer dialogue”, Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 22/1, 170-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2016.309
Sato, M., & Csizér, K. (2021). “Introduction: Combining learner psychology and ISLA research: Intersections in the classroom”, Language Teaching Research, 25/6, 839-855. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044237
Sato, M., & Viveros, P. (2016). Interaction or collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 91-112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.04sat
Shehadeh, A. (1994). “Gender differences and second language acquisition”, Research Journal of Aleppo University (Arts and Humanities Series), 26, 73-98.
Storch, N. (2002). “Patterns of interaction in ESL pairwork”, Language Learning, 52/1, 119-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). “Pairing learners in pair work activity”, Language Teaching Research, 17/1, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457530
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82/3, 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-8). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664.pub2
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
UCLES (n.d.). A2 Flyers. Available at: https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/flyers/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). “Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners”, Language Teaching Research, 11/2, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168806070745
