Thinking through the tool: collaborative archaeological bodywork in immersive virtual reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.19806Keywords:
virtual reality, interpretation, embodiment, photogrammetry, Andean archaeology, cultural heritage, 3D documentationAbstract
Thanks to currently available very high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) models via photogrammetric techniques as a primary method of archaeological documentation, constructing immersive, high-fidelity simulacra is imminently possible. This paper considers how the scale at which the human body interacts with immersive digital models is especially important for understanding the affordances and ergonomics of past things and places. The implications of this isometry between archaeological objects of analysis and emerging capabilities to interact with them through digital surrogates in the present are manifold. By enabling interaction with objects and contexts in immersive virtual space, such observational experiences create in silico engagements that are repeatable, distributable, and collaborative. In particular, it is the collaborative capacity of this technology that this paper explores using online immersive virtual reality (iVR). Collaborative online iVR is used in this research as a key instrument for enhancing understanding and reinterpreting the digital records of two archaeological sites under excavation in Peru. The case studies analyzed show a variety of cultural, geographic, and temporal contexts in the Andean region, which illustrates the broad potential of iVR for archaeological hermeneutics. Through iVR frameworks, the authors engage with embodied reconsiderations of Catholic ritual spaces within a planned colonial town in the southern Peruvian highlands and the pre-Columbian site of Huaca Colorada on the north coast. Synchronous scalar experiences that privilege the affordances of architectural space within digital models create opportunities for embodied experience and collaborative dialogue. A fundamental argument is the capacity to digitally inhabit these places and manipulate materials holds subtle as well as profound epistemological and hermeneutic implications for archaeological knowledge construction.
Downloads
References
Aida, J., Chau, B., & Dunn, J. (2018). Immersive virtual reality in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a literature review. NeuroRehabilitation, 42(4), 441-448. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172361
Alfaro, L., Rivera, C., Luna-Urquizo, J., & Fialho, F. (2019). Virtual reality full immersion techniques for enhancing workers performance, 20 years later: a review and a reformulation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(10), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101066
Appel, L., Appel, E., Bogler, O., Wiseman, M., Cohen, L., Ein, N., Abrams, H. B., & Campos, J. L. (2020). Older adults with cognitive and/or physical impairments can benefit from immersive virtual reality experiences: a feasibility study. Frontiers in Medicine, 6, 329, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00329
Aycock, J. (2021). The coming tsunami of digital artefacts. Antiquity, 95(384), 1584-1589. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.84
Bauer, A. C. M., & Andringa, G. (2020). The potential of immersive virtual reality for cognitive training in elderly. Gerontology, 66(6), 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509830
Bekele, M. K., & Champion, E. (2019). A comparison of immersive realities and interaction methods: Cultural learning in virtual heritage. Frontiers in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, 6(91), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00091
Burin, D., Liu, Y., Yamaya, N., & Kawashima, R. (2020). Virtual training leads to physical, cognitive, and neural benefits in healthy adults. Neuroimage, 222, 117297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117297
Carnevale, A., Mannocchi, I., Sassi, M. S. H., Carli, M., De Luca, G., Longo, U. G., Denaro, V., & Schena, E. (2022). Virtual reality for shoulder rehabilitation: Accuracy evaluation of oculus quest 2. Sensors, 22(15), 5511. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155511
Carter, W. M. (2017). Virtual Archaeology, Virtual Longhouses and "envisioning the unseen" within the archaeological record (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/virtual-archaeology-longhouses-envisioning-unseen/docview/2714866407/se-2 https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/bdzru
Cassidy, B., Sim, G., Robinson, D. W., & Gandy, D. (2019). A virtual reality platform for analyzing remote archaeological sites. Interacting with Computers, 31(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz011
Cassidy, K. C., Šefčík, J., Raghav, Y., Chang, A., & Durrant, J. D. (2020). ProteinVR: Web-based molecular visualization in virtual reality. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(3), e1007747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007747
Champion, E., & Rahaman, H. (2020). Survey of 3D digital heritage repositories and platforms. Virtual Archaeology Review, 11(23), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.13226
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
Dell'Unto, N., & Landeschi, G. (2022). Archaeological 3D GIS (pp. 176). London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034131
De Bonis, M., Nguyen, H., & Bourdot, P. (2022, October). A Literature Review of User Studies in Extended Reality Applications for Archaeology. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 92-101). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00023
De Luca, R., Bonanno, M., Rifici, C., Pollicino, P., Caminiti, A., Morone, G., & Calabrò, R. S. (2022). Does non-immersive virtual reality improve attention processes in severe traumatic brain injury? Encouraging data from a pilot study. Brain Sciences, 12(9), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091211
Derudas, P., & Berggren, Å. (2021). Expanding field-archaeology education: The integration of 3D technology into archaeological training. Open Archaeology, 7(1), 556-573. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0146
Díaz-Guardamino, M., & Morgan, C. (2019). Human, transhuman, posthuman digital archaeologies: an introduction. European Journal of Archaeology, 22(3), 320-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.26
Ellenberger, K. (2017). Virtual and augmented reality in public archaeology teaching. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5(3), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.20
Eve, S. (2014). Dead Men's Eyes: embodied GIS, mixed reality and landscape archaeology. BAR Br. Ser. 600. Oxford: UK: Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407312910
Eve, S. (2017). The Embodied GIS. Using Mixed Reality to explore multi-sensory archaeological landscapes. Internet Archaeology, 44. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.44.3
Forte, M., & Kurillo, G. (2015). Teleimmersive archaeology. Archeomatica, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.48258/arc.v6i5.1665
Frederiksen, J. G., Sørensen, S. M. D., Konge, L., Svendsen, M. B. S., Nobel-Jørgensen, M., Bjerrum, F., & Andersen, S. A. W. (2020). Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 34, 1244-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06887-8
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward and Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gillings, M. (2009). Visual affordance, landscape, and the megaliths of Alderney. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 28(4), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0092.2009.00332.x
Gillings, M. (2012). Landscape phenomenology, GIS and the role of affordance. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19, 601-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9137-4
González-Tennant, E. (2010). Virtual archaeology and digital storytelling: A report from Rosewood, Florida. African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter, 13(3), 1. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/adan/vol13/iss3/1
Gushima, K., & Nakajima, T. (2021). Virtual fieldwork: Designing augmented reality applications using virtual reality worlds. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 417-430). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_29
Haraway, D. (2013). Situated Knowledges: The science question in Feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Women, Science, and Technology (pp. 455-472). London: Routledge.
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the Body: an intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x
Hess, M., Colson, A., & Hindmarch, J. (2018). Capacity building and knowledge exchange of digital technologies in cultural heritage institutions. Museum International, 70(1-2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/muse.12192
Hodder, I. (1999). The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Huggett, J. (2015). A Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology. Open Archaeology, 1(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0002
Huggett, J., Reilly, P., and Lock, G. (2018) Whither digital archaeological knowledge? The challenge of unstable futures. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1 (1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.7
Johnsen, H., & Olsen, B. (1992). Hermeneutics and Archaeology: on the philosophy of contextual archaeology. American Antiquity, 57(3), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.2307/280931
Kotoula, E., Robinson, D., Gandy, D., & Jolie, E. (2019). Computational photography, 3-D modelling, and online publication of basketry for Cache Cave, California. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 7(4), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2019.23
Lang, M., Hussein, R., & Kluge, P. (2023). The 3D Digital Documentation of Shaft K24 in Saqqara. In Lucarelli, R., Roberson, J. A., & Vinson, S. (Eds.), Ancient Egypt, New Technology: The Present and Future of Computer Visualization, Virtual Reality and Other Digital Humanities in Egyptology (pp. 186-212). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501294_009
Llobera, M. (1996). Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity, 70(269), 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00083745
Lombardo, V., & Lauro, V. (2022, July). Prototype of virtual reality and CAVE installation for transdisciplinary archeology. In 2022 12th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 581-586). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAIAAI55812.2022.00116
Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., & Braun, D. (2020). The digital revolution to come: photogrammetry in archaeological practice. American Antiquity, 85(4), 737-760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59
Montello, D. R., Waller, D., Hegarty, M., & Richardson, A. E. (2004). Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In G. L. Allen, (Ed.), Human Spatial Memory (pp. 271-306). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609984-21
Morgan, C. (2021). An archaeology of digital things: social, political, polemical. Antiquity, 95(384), 1590-1593. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.125
Morgan, C. (2022). Current digital archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 51, 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-114101
Mumford, J. R. (2012). Vertical Empire: The General Resettlement of Indians in the Colonial Andes. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395591
Myers, N. (2008). Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modelling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 163-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082969
Opgenhaffen, L. (2021). Visualizing archaeologists: a reflexive history of visualization practice in archaeology. Open Archaeology, 7(1), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0138
Ou, Y. K., Wang, Y. L., Chang, H. C., Yen, S. Y., Zheng, Y. H., & Lee, B. O. (2020). Development of virtual reality rehabilitation games for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 5713-5720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01945-9
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
Perry, S., Taylor, J. S., Matsumoto, M., & Uleberg, E. (2018). Theorizing the digital: A call to action for the archaeological community. In Oceans of data: Proceedings of the 44th conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (pp. 11-22). Oxford: Archaeopress. http://digital.casalini.it/9781784917319
Pujol, L., & Champion, E. (2012). Evaluating presence in cultural heritage projects. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.577796
Quinio, B., Boulbes, N., De Pechpeyrou, P., & Kotras, B. (2020). Use cases of virtual reality to visualize a database: how useful is VR for archaeology researchers?. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1145/3423603.3424001
Rahaman, H., Champion, E., & Bekele, M. (2019). From photo to 3D to mixed reality: A complete workflow for cultural heritage visualisation and experience. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 13, e00102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00102
Reinhard, A. D. (2018). Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games. New York: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04bb5
Reinhard, A. D. (2019). Archaeology of digital environments: tools, methods, and approaches (Doctoral dissertation, University of York). Retrieved from https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/26499/
Reinhard, A., & Zaia, S. (2023). Photogrammetry and GIS in Human-Occupied Digital Landscapes. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.30
Richards-Rissetto, H., & Landau, K., (2019). Digitally-Mediated Practices of Geospatial Archaeological Data: Transformation, Integration, & Interpretation. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 2(1), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.30
Robinson, D., Rosemont, C., Gandy, D., & Cassidy, B. (2021). When the virtual becomes actual: Indigenous ontologies within immersive reality environments. In Ó. M. Abadía, & M. Porr, (Eds.), Ontologies of Rock Art: Images, Relational Approaches and Indigenous Knowledges (pp. 412-430). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321863-20
Roosevelt, C. H., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B. R., & Ünlüsoy, S. (2015). Excavation is destruction digitization: advances in archaeological practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(3), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
Sapirstein, P., & Murray, S. (2017). Establishing best practices for photogrammetric recording during archaeological fieldwork. Journal of Field Archaeology, 42(4), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2017.1338513
Sayma, M., Tuijt, R., Cooper, C., & Walters, K. (2020). Are we there yet? Immersive virtual reality to improve cognitive function in dementia and mild cognitive impairment. The Gerontologist, 60(7), 502-512. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz132
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992). Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Simpson, M. (2020). Scale and space: Representations in immersive virtual reality (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/scale-space-representations-immersive-virtual/docview/2572606674/se-2
Spence Morrow, G. (2019) Scaling the Huaca: Constructing space, time, and identity at the late Moche ceremonial centre of Huaca Colorada, Jequetepeque Valley, Peru (Doctoral Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/scaling-huaca-constructing-space-time-identity-at/docview/2324854715
Statham, N. (2019). Scientific rigour of online platforms for 3D visualization of heritage. Virtual Archaeology Review, 10(20), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2019.9715
Stoffregen, T. A. (2000). Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_1
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
Swenson, E. R. (2018). Assembling the Moche: the power of temporary gatherings on the North Coast of Peru. World Archaeology, 50(1), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1474132
Varela-Aldás, J., Palacios-Navarro, G., Amariglio, R., & García-Magariño, I. (2020). Head-mounted display-based application for cognitive training. Sensors, 20(22), 6552, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226552
Wernke, S. A. (2013). Negotiated Settlements: Andean Communities and Landscapes under Inka and Spanish Colonialism. Gainsville: University Press of Florida. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813042497.001.0001
Wernke, S. A. (2015). Building Tension. Dilemmas of the Built Environment through Inca and Spanish Rule. In M. Barnes, I. de Castro, J. Flores Espinoza, D. Kurella, K. Noack (Eds.), Tribus Sonderband / Special Edition: Perspectives on the Inca, International Symposium at Linden-Museum Stuttgart in Cooperation with Universität Bonn, Abteilung für Altamerikanistik from March 3rd to March 5th, 2014 (pp. 226-251). Stuttgart: Linden-Museum Stuttgart, Staatliches Museum für Völkerkunde.
Wernke, S. A., Kohut, L. E., & Traslaviña, A. (2017). A GIS of affordances: movement and visibility at a planned colonial town in highland Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science, 84, 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.004
Wilkins, B. (2020). Designing a Collaborative Peer-to-peer System for Archaeology: The DigVentures Platform. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 3(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.34
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Virtual Archaeology Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
