Towards a shared and transparent methodology for hypothetical virtual reconstructions: selected case studies
Submitted: 2025-07-10
|Accepted: 2025-07-11
|Published: 2025-07-21
Copyright (c) 2025 Virtual Archaeology Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
architectural heritage, virtual archaeology, digital repository, cultural heritage, open educational resources, 3D reconstruction
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
This article presents a selection of case studies developed within the Erasmus+ project CoVHer –Computer-based Visualization of Architectural Cultural Heritage (2022–2025), alongside the underpinning methodological framework. The project focused on the digital reconstruction of architectural works that have been lost or were never built, addressing critical concerns regarding the scientific credibility, transparency, and educational value of such hypothetical reconstructions. Building on previous collaborations, including contributions to the DFG Research Network: Digital 3D Reconstructions as Tools of Architectural Historical Research (2018–2022), CoVHer further developed key concepts and best practices in the field. It aimed to establish a shared methodology and vocabulary for virtual 3D reconstructions, especially in cases where physical remains are absent. The project produced four main results: (1) a set of theoretical principles and operational guidelines (CoVHer Guidelines) for assessing the scientific quality of 3D reconstructions, structured around criteria such as constructive accuracy, source traceability, interoperability, and communicative effectiveness; (2) a series of 3D case-study reconstructions developed by partner institutions and evaluated according to these criteria, incorporating polygonal and mathematical modelling as well as virtual and mixed reality technologies; (3) the CoVHer Repository, an online platform designed to store and share scientifically validated reconstructions, complete with documentation and metadata structured using a CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM)-based ontology; and (4) the development of Open Educational Resources, including a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) hosted by the University of Bologna and blended learning modules implemented across participating institutions. Through this integrated approach, CoVHer has contributed to defining standards and tools for scholarly reconstruction practices, promoting critical engagement with digital heritage, and enhancing educational strategies in architecture and historical studies. The project’s outcomes are intended to support researchers, educators, and cultural institutions in producing and disseminating credible, transparent, and reusable virtual reconstructions.
References:
Apollonio, F. I., Fallavollita, F., & Foschi, R. (2021). The Critical Digital Model for the Study of Unbuilt Architecture. In F. Niebling, S. Münster, H. Messemer (Eds.), Workshop on Research and Education in Urban History in the Age of Digital Libraries (pp. 3–24). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93186-5_1
Apollonio, F. I., Fallavollita, F., & Foschi, R. (2025). Reconstruction of S. Margherita Project of 1685 as designed by Agostino Barelli. Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(32), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22554
Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage (2009), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529
CoVHer Website (2023). Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://covher.eu/
CoVHer Glossary Website (2024). Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://covher.eu/glossary/
CoVHer MOOC Website (2024). Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://book.unibo.it/
D’Addario, N., & Garrido de Oliveira, C. (2025). Redesigning Bramante’s rounded perspective: digital speculations on the unbuilt cloister of the Tempietto. Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(33). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22605
de Azambuja Varela, P., Marques, J. L., & de Matos Silva, A. (2025). Digital reconstruction of Barros Lima’s design for São Torcato Sanctuary, 1825. Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(33). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22610
DFG Research Network Website: Digital 3D Reconstructions as Tools of Architectural Historical Research (2018-2022) website. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://www.gw.uni-jena.de/en/14530/dfg-netzwerk-3d-rekonstruktion.
Fallavollita, F., Foschi, R., Apollonio, F. I., & Cazzaro, I. (2024). Terminological Study for Scientific Hypothetical 3D Reconstruction. Heritage, 7(9), 4755–4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090225
Franczuk, J. (2025). Information processes in Virtual 3D reconstruction of Roman Three-Bay Double Arch of Musti (Tunisia). Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(32), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22543
Grellert, M., Wacker, M., Bruschke, J., Stille, W., & Beck, D. (2023). Documentation and Evaluation of Virtual Reconstructions. International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (2023 IMEKO), (pp. 653–658). https://doi.org/10.21014/tc4-ARC-2023.122
ICOMOS (2017). ‘Seville Principles’, 19th ICOMOS General Assembly, New Delhi. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from: http://sevilleprinciples.com/.
Lutteroth, J., Kuroczyński, P., & Bajena, I. P. (2025). Digital 3D reconstructions of synagogues for an innovative approach on Jewish architectural heritage in East Central Europe. Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(32), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22542
Münster, S., Apollonio, F. I., Bluemel, I., Fallavollita, F., Foschi, R., Grellert, M., …, & Schelbert, G. (2024). Handbook of Digital 3D Reconstruction of Historical Architecture. Cham: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43363-4
D Repository for Computer-based Visualization of Architectural Cultural Heritage website (2025). Retrieved July 8, 2025, from: https://repository.covher.eu/
Tzerpou, E., Campana, I., Salazar, J., López-Bultó, O., Palomo, A., Piqué, R., Terradas, X., & Barceló, J. A. (2025). 3D hypothetical reconstruction of a Neolithic hut from the waterlogged site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain). Virtual Archaeology Review, 16(33). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.22557
