Reconstrucción de fragmentos arqueológicos mediante correspondencia de patrones
Submitted: 2015-12-17
|Accepted: 2015-12-17
|Published: 2012-11-01
Downloads
Keywords:
Part reconstruction, Pattern matching, Surface registration, Image analysis
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
This paper introduces a method for automatic archaeological fragment reconstruction, based on the pattern matching techniques originally developed in graphic computing and image analysis fields. The method is embodied in a software tool that provides the bests matches in a set of bi-dimensional archaeological fragments.
To ensure the efficiency of the results, it has been developed a theoretical study that allows solving the stated problem, ensuring the correction of results, and with a very competitive execution times.
References:
AIGER D., MITRA N. J., COHEN-OR D. (2008): “4-points congruent sets for robust surface registration”, en ACM Transactions On Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), pp. 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360684
BROWN B. J. et al. (2008): “A System for High-Volume Acquisition and Matching of Fresco Fragments: Reassembling Theran Wall Paintings”, en ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol 27, no 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1399504.1360683
FISCHLER M. A., BOLLES R. C. (1981): “Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography”, en Commun ACM, pp. 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1145/358669.358692
HUTTENLOCHER D. P., ULLMAN S. (1990): “Recognizing solid objects by alignment with an image”, en International Journal of Computer Vision, pp. 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054921
KOLLER D. et al. (2005): “Fragments of the City: Stanford's Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project”, en Journal of Roman Archaeology (Proc. of the Third Williams Symposium on Classical Architecture).
NIHSHANKA D. (2007): “Project Report – A Survey of Recent Advances in Shape Matching”. Duke University, Durham, USA.
PAULY M., et al. (2005): “Example-based 3D scan completion”, en Proceedings Symposiumon Geometric Processing (SGP).
RUSINKIEWICZ S., LEVOY M. (2001): “Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm”, en Proceedings 3rd International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/im.2001.924423
VAN KAICK O. et al. (2010): “A Survey on Shape Correspondence”, en Eurographics STAR Report (2010)
